Wednesday 30 October 2013

Oh my God, look at Christopher Pyne’s hair!



As I tuned in to Q&A this week, I was viciously confronted by a Hanson-esque, short and tight, 80s perm. Pyne always reminds me of a John Waters' caricature. You know, when Serial Mom is questioning the character of the high school girl because she has bad hair.  Serial Mom reminds us how important it is to question the credibility of those individuals whose hairstyles embody a time and a place where gay men often; hated themselves, married women and joined the Liberal Party.  Secretly, I also imagine dressing as Serial Mom, with Christopher Pyne as my Mr Stubbins.


As Pyne yapped, I suffered another terrifying flashback.  It was 2011 and John Howard was launching Mining Company Director Ian Plimer’s new book, How to Get Expelled from school:  A guide to climate change for pupils, parents and punters, at Sydney Fucking Mining Club. The book was typical climate change denialism aimed at innocent school children and their concerned parents who, according to Plimer, were his inspiration.   It received much the same reception as everything else Plimer has written, people with half a brain labelling it as a pile of pseudoscientific dog shit. Left wingers declared that it might be easier to get disciplined by your school by standing up at parade and declaring that you are a poofter?  In 2009, Tony Abbott spoke through his red speedos of Plimer, “I think that in response to the IPCC alarmist - in inverted commas - view, there've been quite a lot of other reputable scientific voices. Now not everyone agrees with Ian Plimer's position, but he is a highly credible scientist and he has written what seems like a very well-argued book refuting most of the claims of the climate catastrophists."[1]

When he launched Plimer’s book, Howard unashamedly expressed his fears about left wing radicals.  Since then, we have been bombarded by paranoid conservatives' perceiving threats that progressive people pose to both the independence of private schools and the school curriculum. This neo-conservative ‘thinking’ is perfectly embodied in Kevin Donnelly, director of Education Standards Institute, a right wing think tank.  On the Institute's website, Donnelly [2] declares, “at a time of international terrorism represented by radical Islam and jihad there is no attempt to teach students about the liberal, democratic institutions and values that ensure Australia's stability and peace. Christianity barley rates a mention and ignored is that there are some cultural practices that are un-Australian and abhorrent to our way of life and that values like tolerance, civility and a commitment to freedom are a characteristic of Western, liberal democracies”. The independent authority responsible for the development of the national curriculum, the Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority (ACARA) [3] have dismissed such claims, directly responding to the paranoid delusions of conservatives in their media releases.

Donnelly embodies the kind of conservative thinking about multiculturalism, terrorism, Islam, Muslims, socialism and the Greens, (just to name a few), that fascinates a pitchfork bearing public.  His critique of Greens’ policies extends to their embrace of sexual and gender diversity.  Donnelly believes that non-government schools must be allowed to discriminate against those that individuals who do not conform to narrow sexual and gender norms, in the hiring of staff or selection of students.  He also expresses his concern about the Greens' call for age appropriate information about the diversity of sexuality and gender be taught at schools.  Donnelly argues that imposing this on religious schools, “flies in the face of international human rights agreements and conventions protecting religious freedom”[4].  What a coincidence that Tony Abbott launched his party’s education policy at a Christian school in Western Sydney that (on its website) described homosexuality as an abomination[6].  The explicit homophobia has since been retracted in ‘The Donna Summer Act’ of 2013.

Anyway, back to this week’s Q&A. Pyne was carrying on like a privileged white, Western, kinda heterosexualish male, spewing statements which reflected and reinforced fear of socialism and environmentalism.  In his discussion of the national curriculum, he encouraged the viewer to think that the themes permeating it were not what good parents want.  Pyne was echoing Donnelly’s recent claims that every subject has to be taught through environmental, Indigenous and Asian perspectives [7].  The ACARA dispelled [8] Donnelly’s assertion. “They are identified as issues that should be addressed but only where relevant and as part of the teaching of the traditional disciplines of knowledge,” the ACARA said.  I haven't been to school for 20 years, but I have my doubts that school kids are being encouraged to deconstruct capitalist philosophy and engage in rigorous questioning of economic rationalism and rampant individualism.  


[4] p.33 in The Greens: Policies, Reality and Consequences (2011) editor: Andrew McIntyre. Connor Court.

Watch this











1 comment:

  1. Kev, Pyne, and their mob still at it.

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jan/10/the-men-behind-the-school-curriculum-review

    ReplyDelete